Page 1 of 1
even hollywood is getting depressed...
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 5:40 pm
by sun rat
went to see harry potter today and these trailers were back to back:
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="
http://www.youtube.com/v/k6kQyBROXQQ&co ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="
http://www.youtube.com/v/k6kQyBROXQQ&co ... edded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="
http://www.youtube.com/v/mDH0e73_j8M&co ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="
http://www.youtube.com/v/mDH0e73_j8M&co ... edded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 6:31 pm
by ninemileskid
In that second one, at about 35 seconds in, that canvas creature's schlong is hanging out. What's it rated?
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 6:42 pm
by sun rat
ninemileskid wrote:In that second one, at about 35 seconds in, that canvas creature's schlong is hanging out. What's it rated?
it's a zipper.
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:01 pm
by ninemileskid
So it's not a schlong but it's zipper's down?
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:05 pm
by piccini9
edit
Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 3:04 am
by DerGolgo
So, it's basically the Matrix without the whole metaphysical what-is-real-and-what-isn't stuff but with puppets. Okay...
Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 4:13 pm
by roadmissile
9 actually looks cool, at the very least on a visual level, 2012 just looks flat out retarded.
/RM
Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:54 pm
by Whiskeywrist
I remember seeing 9 in it's prototype form in an animation festival several years ago- I think there was no dialog...
Anyone else remember this?
Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:01 pm
by roadmissile
I do, it was good, but only a short film version.
/RM
Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:45 pm
by xtian
roadmissile wrote:9 actually looks cool, at the very least on a visual level, 2012 just looks flat out retarded.
/RM
exactly. judeao-christian mishmash and american family value with cheap cgi effects versus creativity
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:49 am
by sun rat
to be honest, the cgi effects for 2012 were astonishingly well-done as viewed on the wide screen.
seriously.
in fact, if it weren't for the opening scenes in harry potter i would say that harry was upstaged by those two trailers.
incidentally, who remembers the black and white(could have been color, but my folks had a b&w TV) film ages ago with an end of the world scenario and a rocket ship into space? i think 2012 may be a remake of that.
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:58 am
by roadmissile
sun rat wrote:to be honest, the cgi effects for 2012 were astonishingly well-done as viewed on the wide screen.
seriously.
My issue is that the effects people put up big flashy explosions and people looooove it, but underlying it is a combined element of spectacle for spectacle sake and intense laziness. For someone that doesn't know how buildings work that shot in Rome of a toppled dome practically skiing across a plaza over people might be impressive, but it made me want to walk out of the trailer.
That and disaster films are just done to fucking death.
/RM
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:12 am
by Bigshankhank
roadmissile wrote:
My issue is that the effects people put up big flashy explosions and people looooove it, but underlying it is a combined element of spectacle for spectacle sake and intense laziness. For someone that doesn't know how buildings work that shot in Rome of a toppled dome practically skiing across a plaza over people might be impressive, but it made me want to walk out of the trailer.
/RM
Physics? Physics is teh ghey, don't worry about them.
Honestly I cannot deal with people that get on my case for not enjoying a "popcorn" movie, "Hey man, its not suposed to be real, its supposed to be fun." Fuck that, they can make it look real if they want to, and it would make for an overall better film. See Xfmrs 2 as a perfect example of missing the mark in favor of flash.
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:25 am
by roadmissile
Bigshankhank wrote:See Xfmrs 2 as a perfect example of missing the mark in favor of flash.
Good god, I saw it free on the internets and still want my money back.
/RM
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:42 pm
by sun rat
i understand your issues with the physics, or rather, lack thereof.
i have the same type of issues with lots of other stuff in movies for sure.
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:01 am
by SidVicious
sun rat wrote:
incidentally, who remembers the black and white(could have been color, but my folks had a b&w TV) film ages ago with an end of the world scenario and a rocket ship into space? i think 2012 may be a remake of that.
could it perhaps be this?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_Worlds_Collide_(film)
twas good movie.
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:56 am
by sun rat
SidVicious wrote:sun rat wrote:
incidentally, who remembers the black and white(could have been color, but my folks had a b&w TV) film ages ago with an end of the world scenario and a rocket ship into space? i think 2012 may be a remake of that.
could it perhaps be this?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_Worlds_Collide_(film)
twas good movie.
yep. that's it. thanks.
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:17 pm
by SidVicious
sun rat wrote:SidVicious wrote:sun rat wrote:
incidentally, who remembers the black and white(could have been color, but my folks had a b&w TV) film ages ago with an end of the world scenario and a rocket ship into space? i think 2012 may be a remake of that.
could it perhaps be this?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_Worlds_Collide_(film)
twas good movie.
yep. that's it. thanks.
np. and for the record it was in glorious color.
i'm waiting the sequel. want to read the book.