Page 1 of 1
Marge Simpson poses for Playboy - Not on TV but for Real
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:08 am
by DerGolgo
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091009/ap_ ... ge_simpson
No, it's not the next Simpsons episode (although it
would make a heck of a crossover marketing event), there will actually be nude, officially sanctioned Marge Simpson pictures in the next Playboy.
What the heck?
I mean Playboy featuring a graphic artist's hard work as the centerfold rather than a real person is the norm, isn't it, but what does this say about Playboy, the Simpsons, and a society that will buy this?
Can you imagine Wilma Flintstone in Playboy?
Well, okay, but do you honestly think this could have happened back when the Flintstones were still current?
Re: Marge Simpson poses for Playboy - Not on TV but for Real
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 12:01 pm
by Jaeger
DerGolgo wrote:
Can you imagine Wilma Flintstone in Playboy?
Mmmmm...
Betty...
--Jaeger
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 6:13 pm
by SidVicious
i'd hit it.
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:15 am
by SmAsHeRs
two questions: does the carpet match the drapes (or linoleum!?!), and when does playboy go Guro?
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:36 pm
by SmAsHeRs
3 of 4 dangerously close to furry propaganda... not sure what to think of olive oyl.
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:59 pm
by MagnusTheBuilder
SmAsHeRs wrote:3 of 4 dangerously close to furry propaganda... not sure what to think of olive oyl.
Don't think too hard about Olive Oyl, some things you just can't un-see. At least not without some serious brain-bleach.
The one that bothered me the most is the one with Kanga, seriously, how fucked up is it to have a kid in the picture with his mom on the cover of playboy, that is some serious therapy down the road. Also... 'Get Up In There?' seems offensive for no real specific reason, just generally icky.
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 5:37 pm
by sweetpea
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 6:20 am
by SmAsHeRs
fucking creepy. i love my fair share of hentai but those are just creepy. except kuzco was funny.
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 6:36 am
by Jaeger
MagnusTheBuilder wrote:
The one that bothered me the most is the one with Kanga, seriously, how fucked up is it to have a kid in the picture with his mom on the cover of playboy, that is some serious therapy down the road. Also... 'Get Up In There?' seems offensive for no real specific reason, just generally icky.[/color]
What're you talking about, man? THAT'S THE BEST PART!
Ok, ok -- I actually had an argument with an Aussie some years ago when I accused him of being a kangaroo fucker... he corrected me. "We don't fuck the kangaroos; their tails get in the way. They felliate us."
But yeah... mmm... marsupial sodomy... dets hawt.
--Jaeger
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 6:46 am
by rc26
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:24 am
by MagnusTheBuilder
Heard on the radio this morning that the marge issue of playboy is out on newsstands today.
