UTMC

You should change your title from "Barrista of Doom" to "Princeps Mathematicorum."

Just sayin.

WeAintFoundShit wrote:You should change your title from "Barrista of Doom" to "Princeps Mathematicorum."

Just sayin.

Always been a bigger fan of Galois over Gauss (how big of a geek do you have to be to have a favorite mathematician??)...screen name actually came from the De-Gauss button on an old monitor, and from some folks at UCSB thinking my humor as white noise/static...

Damn it, now you know too much about me already...there goes my international mathematical man of mystery mystique I've been crafting for all these years.

Gauss wrote:Damn it, now you know too much about me already...there goes my international mathematical man of mystery mystique I've been crafting for all these years.

The effectiveness of your mystique, could it be following a...normal distribution?

EDIT:
IF you are a true math-geek, you will plot this:
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99 ... imetex.gif

Sorry, just came about this and thought of you

DerGolgo wrote:

Gauss wrote:Damn it, now you know too much about me already...there goes my international mathematical man of mystery mystique I've been crafting for all these years.

The effectiveness of your mystique, could it be following a...normal distribution?

My mystique is most analogous to the theorem that states there cannot exist a continuous non vanishing tangental vector field on a sphere...aka...The Hairy Ball Theorem


I don't really understand why either...other than I just liked being able to say "Hmm yes, yes, but how can that be applied to Hairy Balls?" repeatedly, with a straight face while disussing Topology with gravely serious research mathematicians ....who admit that they in fact cannot tell the difference between a coffee cup and a doughnut, or their ass and a hole in the ground for that matter, but can tell the difference between their ass and two holes in the ground

Yay for math jokes!

DerGolgo wrote:

Gauss wrote:Damn it, now you know too much about me already...there goes my international mathematical man of mystery mystique I've been crafting for all these years.

The effectiveness of your mystique, could it be following a...normal distribution?

EDIT:
IF you are a true math-geek, you will plot this:
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99 ... imetex.gif

Sorry, just came about this and thought of you

Sigh...

You know that's going to take me like, twenty fucking minutes to punch in, right?

This had better be good.

Yeah, that didn't work.

Don't feed me bad ideas when I'm tired. I'll do them.