UTMC

Crazy to the point where I actually feel kinda bad for her. But damn, the people behind her are pretty funny to watch.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nMANMIe0ZZI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I had to fast forward from the description of the connection between winter madness and anal sex.

And somehow, you just know, this person is licensed to operate a motor vehicle, permitted to own a firearm and enter legally binding contracts. Where's the straight jacket when you need it? Just tell her it's a straight jacket, she'll probably volunteer to wear it.

its like shes reading the banner at the bottom of the lunatic channel. Has Tosh gotten this yet?

it's like a fucked up Cukoo hate poem. I think I'll make it my ringtone, justto be an asshole.

Oooh, she's fun!

This must be her daughter:
(Haha, whoa crap, I've never seen this version. It's like a parade of hits!)
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/dChBN_zfofY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

After I was finished ripping this person to shreds on facecrack, a friend sent me this article:

http://journalstar.com/news/local/govt- ... ff202.html

Yeah, like I said, I feel bad for her. It's the crowd reaction that makes this a funny thing to watch. If it was just her against a blank background, it would probably just be depressing.

koo-koo pants

I see this and I worry about the not-insane homophobes out there.
They'd probably be all like "Yeah, that lady is batshit crazy! But, you know, they do do that, she's insane but she makes a valid point..."
Since they don't vocalize their own shitty beliefs and feelings in the same manner, they might conceive this as affirmation.
After all, their vanity, lack of self-reflection and fragile self-image tells them they aren't insane like that, they are reasonable and rational in comparison, so what they believe and feel must be reasonable and rational, too. After all, any criticism of her speech would necessarily be focused on her obvious insanity, her insanity would be the whole point of why she's wrong - critique of the content itself would not only be outweighed by that, but look positively invalid because, hey, she's insane, you can't critique what she's saying because of how she's saying it. Without any angle of attack on that being left because of the overriding insanity, it goes uncriticized enough to appear correct.

Also, someone pass that lady the straight-jacket. Just tell her it's a straight-jacket, she'll wear it voluntarily.

I think the key here is the power of the interwebs to both amplify and strip from context. The people in the room with that woman have a lot of experience with her, enough to decide to let her do her thing. I do not envy them.

having had my fair share of hearings whereby the "public" has their "comment" time, this lovely woman and her views sound a lot like the other "opinions" about: Obama/Conspiracy/ Bilderburg/ Illuminati/ Alien taxi-drivers/ replicants . . . etc. and those examples are just the ones that come to mind.

Free speech has its price.

WeAintFoundShit wrote:<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nMANMIe0ZZI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

This video is private.

Any public ones for us latecomers?

Here you go:
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/8fTRhOw76do" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>