Page 1 of 1

Why would anyone want to filter "movie smut"?

Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:52 am
by Photo
What will the men of the United States do if the dark overlords of censorship can digitally filter out our movie smut?

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=s ... lm_smut_dc

I, for one, am forming a protest group to combat this.

My newly-formed porno-rights organization,
Digital Untruth of Movie Blurring & Filtering Undermines Carnal Knowledge, or D.U.M.B.F.U.C.K., will bring the truth about digital filtering and blurring to the sheltered, conservatively-reared (and hopefully well-spanked) youth of this country.

Of course I may be arrested and jailed in this struggle, but dammit, somebody has to stand up for Hollywood. They have the constitutionally-protected right to make huge piles of cash by exposing all the naughty bits of its prettier actors and actresses.

Who's with me? Slash6? Pavement?

Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 11:13 am
by lifeon2
I'm with you man what we really need is more smut :)

Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 11:17 am
by happycommuter
C'mon, you don't want chillens to see people fornicating. It's much healthier for them to see shit blowing up and people spraying bullets all over the place. ya know, good clean fun.

Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 4:12 pm
by Neon
The differance between art and porno is if you jack off to it or not. I think trying to censor any form of entertainment is a waste of time... makeing something forbidden usually only serves to spike interest in it. Its always the bible thumping mother fuckers who spend $100 bucks a month spanking it to PPV porno. ( I worked in satelite TV.. its true as the day is too short for more than 8 baths).

If porno was all over, it would be as boring as the mini skirt... which i understand was once rather risque

We should start underground societies of people who now masterbate to dateline because porn has lost its flavor... just to see how the censors react.

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 8:34 am
by DerGolgo
How about this: Before the start of the movie, and on TV during the commercial breaks, a text should be put on sceen, accompanied by the voice of that guy who does "This is CNN" and did Lord Vader.
The message should be:
"Warning. This film contains SMUT! It is FILTHY! If you don't like that kind of thing, don't watch it. "

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 1:25 pm
by DerGolgo
Erm...I guess I was drunk when I first made this post.
It wasn't serious. I took it down in case anyone might get offended or get a sick, twisted and wrong image of me.

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2004 1:54 pm
by DerGolgo
DerGolgo wrote:Erm...I guess I was drunk when I first made this post.
It wasn't serious. I took it down in case anyone might get offended or get a sick, twisted and wrong image of me.
Well, as things go, I am not easily offended. You might say it is nearly impossible to offend me at all. It has been ages since I read anything I found personally offensive. Hence, I don't worry much about offending others.
However, when I, this morning, read what I had posted here yesterday I thought "This is probably offensive to others, or at least make them violently sick. Better take it down before people take umbrage."

However, after some positive feedback, here it is, my post on the topic of smut in film, BACK BY POPULAR DEMAND:

**************************************************

BackDoorBarbie wrote:
"life is too short for soft core" bring on the smut


I agree
I want the raunchiest, filthiest, nastiest, sickest, most vile and degenerate (yet witty and intelligent) entertainment the pervertet minds of Hollywood and elsewhere can concieve.
I wan't chopped of heads, I want schooltime cafeteria massacres, I want a full frontal nudity button on my TV remote working for every show.
I want to see the great Sesame Street Viagra induced madness gang-bang and chainsaw massacre Episode, I want to see cute little Disney figures running for their lives from Napalm bombs and
.50 machine gun fire, I wan't 24 hour topless weather channel and the all-day mauling channel pumped right into my living room!
I wanna see the entire cast of Buffy in one gigantic orgy, I want compulsory porn scenes with all the hot Hollywood babes in each and every theatrical release, I wanna see the Olsen Twins and Paris Hilton eat led while getting it on with the Mormon Tabernacle Choir, I want Star Trek - The nudist lesbian sex-fiend Ship, I want blood sweat and sperm to leak out of my TV screen dammit!

Or, at the very least, somebody could bring back Firefly and Futurama.


**************************************************

Good thing I saved it into a text file before removing it.

Should anyone of you take umbrage at this writing, or any implied associations, well, I am pretty much past caring.

HRMMFF.......

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2004 3:23 pm
by mtne
ACTUALLY........... I DO THINK SMUT SHOULD BE FILTERED!









How else are we suposed to get to the good stuff and do away with the quote / unquote plotline............

Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2004 5:13 pm
by Neon
What ever happened to the real smut scenes? I mean, from like late '80s Chris Lambert films? the movies may have sucked, but damnit, people got it on!
I want a channel that shows only the best 3 seconds of basic instinct over and over. I want an all reality TV celeb torture channel.
I want the olsen twins and brittany spears in a live action version of legend of the OvertFiend!
I want to see those dumb bitches consumed ass first by giant fireballs spit from a ten foot long pulsing monster cock!
I want EarthWorm Jim Back, damnit!

Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2004 6:39 pm
by Maniacles
I am absolutely in favor of filtering! Just think of how much better the world would be without some of the filth that oozes out of Hollywood!
Here's a list of the slime that should be immediately removed from the shelves of the local rental house and burned publicly! Feel free to add your own.

The blacklist of movies that need to filtered:
1: Bill and Teds bogus Journey
-The first one rocked! But the second one sucked dog ass!
2: Anything with Pauley Shore.
-Nuff said.
3: Waterworld
- Leave Mad Max to Mel!
4: The sheltering sky
-Even Malkovich sometimes sucks!
5: Nightfall -Asimov
Just bad!
6: The "comedy central" version of Cheech and Chong movies.
-Blasphemy!

With these groaners out of the way there'll be more room for classics like "Gladsheateher" and Girls gone wild #897!

Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2004 10:26 pm
by Beemer Dan
I kinda hope that the g*vt fcc mahukkaz ban nudity, sex, foul language and violence from movies and tv. That way I can just go to the web for all my needs.

Seriously tho, what's with these tightass donkeyfucking moron legislators always wanting to get in the way of things? Although I wouldn't call most of tv and movies art, they are freedom of expression, and that is the biggest fundamental thing to building a free society. If I gotta live in a world where my friends get murdered, I get hit by a truck, my neighborhood gets shot up, and my "proud country" goes to war over lies, the least the g*vt can do is let me watch a set of boobies on my boob set without a fuggin swat team busting in and arresting me for crimethink.

Fuck the networks, fuck the censors, I'm gonna go watch some HBO before they start screwing with that too. Stupid g*vt cocksuckers.

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 10:58 pm
by Zer0
I couldn't care less about porn. But I will if it starts getting filtered/banned, etc.

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 1:14 am
by roadmissile
Zer0 wrote:I couldn't care less about porn. But I will if it starts getting filtered/banned, etc.
Since we're a good seven years since this thread begun I'm pretty sure the smut is safe... for now. In fact despite a multitude of shitty media oozing out of Hollywood in the interim there has been some pretty solidly watchable stuff in the last 3/4ths of a decade.

I am kind of wondering about why we're doing the timewarp but hey, why the fuck not?

/RM

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:23 am
by guitargeek
roadmissile wrote:why we're doing the timewarp but hey, why the fuck not?
Why the fuck not, indeed?

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:54 am
by Metalredneck
I love you people.
That is all.

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 1:38 pm
by motorpsycho67
guitargeek wrote:
roadmissile wrote:why we're doing the timewarp but hey, why the fuck not?
Why the fuck not, indeed?

Because now the song is stuck in my head...... jerks